https://mooc.elte.hu/eportfolios/30358/Home/Bit_th_h_Thanh_Lanh_ án Thanh Lanh Vĩnh Phúc chỉ cách trung tâm Hà Nội khoảng chừng 60km. https://www.blog.lovinah.com/members/bietthugolftl/activity/155648/ án này có tọa lạc ở xã Trung Mỹ – huyện Bình Xuyên – Vĩnh Phúc với “non thanh nước biếc”, khí hậu trong lành, phong cảnh hùng vĩ. Hứa hẹn khi mở quỹ hàng sẽ tạo thành điểm sáng của BĐS Vĩnh Phúc nói riêng và BĐS phía Bắc nói chung. https://pbase.com/topics/bietthugolftl/bit_th_h_thanh_lanh là quần thể tiện ích trọn bộ, đặc biệt giải quyết mọi hy vọng nghỉ dưỡng 5* cho cả các người mua khó tính nhất.
https://cutt.ly/mF44eqH
https://cutt.ly/GF44o6Y
https://cutt.ly/oF44fFG
https://cutt.ly/VF44jpv
https://cutt.ly/ZF44zpu
https://cutt.ly/9F44v2L
https://cutt.ly/7F44Qpo
https://cutt.ly/BF44RxD

by ConfusedOfHomeCounties on 2004 Aug 29 - 00:41 | reply to this comment
Reply Concerning Nietzsche's Whip
It's a lovely idea, really, but I'm afraid you've got it backwards this time. Nietzsche's whip was wielded by Lou Salome, the femme fatale with whom both he and his friend Paul Ree were infatuated. There's a photo they had taken of them demonstrating their own "take" on this posted at http://uno.edu/~asoble/pages/SALOME.HTM

[Editor's note: the above link did not work for me, but here is the picture I think you are referring to:]



by a Taken In Hand reader on 2004 Aug 29 - 16:23 | reply to this comment
Feminism gave women a choice
In a curious way, the phallus and the rod (stick, cane, paddle, etc.) are much the same. Both are controlled by the man and are used on the woman. Both can bring a woman into subjection. The phallus with a child. The rod by denying her composure. Both deny the woman control over her life – which, of course, is why feminists object to women being subjected to either.

I don't know which feminists you are talking about here because both my husband and I are feminists, he more than me. We have no objections about to women being subjected to discipline.
Obviously no one movement has a single cohesive doctrine one way or the other. As long as there are two people in a movement, religion, philosophy, or political party, there are likely to be two interpretations of what it is about. Binary thinking in the form you express it is falsely divisive and always erroneous.



トップ   新規 一覧 単語検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS